Insights: Equities Rise Again in February Due to Steady Fed and Trade Optimism

View a Printable version


In February, U.S. and foreign stocks again appreciated. The monthly return for the S&P 500, for instance, was 3.21%, U.S. small company stocks in the Russell 2000 Index climbed 5.2%, and non-U.S. stocks in the MSCI ACWI ex-USA gained 1.95%.  Markets continued to respond favorably to Fed Chairman Powell’s and other Board governors’ insistence throughout the month that the Fed would patiently assess whether any additional rate hikes were justified. Optimism also returned that the U.S. and China would announce a trade agreement sometime in March. In the interim an increase in tariffs that was scheduled to go into effect at the beginning of March was delayed.  While we are pleased with February’s additional performance gains, we also continue to encourage restrained expectations given how much markets have moved higher in just the first two months of the year and the fading effects of fiscal stimulus in the U.S., which will likely contribute to decelerating corporate earnings and U.S. economic growth as the year progresses.  In this issue of Insights, we update our outlook on (1) the global economic and investment scene, (2) the effects of developments in the U.S./China trade policy dispute, and (3) the current state and likely path forward for Brexit (i.e., the U.K.’s exit from the European Union).


February was another positive month for U.S. and foreign stocks, as well as certain bonds (see table below).

The S&P 500 rose 3.21% on the month, in line with the Russell 1000 Index of large companies (up 3.39%). The Russell 2000 Index of small companies appreciated 5.20% in the month and is up 17.03% in 2019.  The MSCI ACWI Index Ex-USA index, which is a measure of all stocks outside the U.S., rose 1.95% and is up 9.66% YTD.  The MSCI Emerging Market Index also rose, edging up 0.22% and still up 9.01% YTD through February.

The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index inched down 0.06% but remains positive with a gain of 1.00% for the year through February.  With additional indications of steady interest rate policy from the Federal Reserve, high yield bonds gained 1.69%.

Foreign, U.S. dollar-denominated emerging market bonds in the JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified Index gained 1.00%.  Because the local currency EM bond index, the JPMorgan GBI EM Global Diversified, lost 1.09%, and had been about 1 percentage point higher than the USD-denominated index through January, the two indices essentially traded YTD performance positions.  A 50/50 blend of the two EM bond indices continues to have a YTD gain, through February, of approximately 4.88%.


Economic data in the U.S. remains sound but broadly decelerating.  We continue to think that the near-term risk of recession is low.  Stocks, in particular, have run up very quickly this year off of the lows reached in late December.  We do not think that these gains are unjustified given the 4Q2018 sell-off, but we do wonder to what extent they may be maintained in view of slowing economic growth in the U.S. and in Europe and the possibility that markets have already priced in both a softer Brexit and a coming conclusion to the trade tensions between China and the U.S.

The Global Economic and Investment Complexes

The U.S. economy grew at a 2.6% quarter-over-quarter annualized rate in Q4 of 2018.  Although this was strong compared to growth in other developed market countries like Japan and Germany, it was notably lower than the previous two quarters, which registered growth in the 3-4% range.  The trend to decelerating economic growth as fiscal stimulus from tax reform fades is likely to be a key theme on investors’ minds throughout this year.  It is natural for the pace of growth to slow after an initial fiscal boost, and so it is not alarming, but it does bear monitoring.

A declining growth rate reflects specific activity within the broad economy. The chart from the Wall Street Journal below on the left shows how U.S. manufacturing activity seems to have topped out in mid-2018 and has been expanding at a slower pace since then.  Orders for manufactured goods have slowed in tandem with, or in response to, slower rates of consumer spending, which is evident for instance in recent auto sales data (see the chart from the Wall Street Journal below on the right).

We anticipate that the Q1 GDP growth rate will be slower than Q4 of 2018.  This is primarily due to an expected drag from weak consumption momentum at year-end, declining inventories, a likely decline in residential investment, and a notable effect from the partial government shutdown.

U.S. corporate earnings estimates have been revised lower, which also reflects slower economic growth and the fading effects of fiscal stimulus via tax reform. Earnings expectations seem to have peaked in 3Q2018 and have dropped sharply since then.  This has occurred for the S&P 500 Index companies across sectors.

Downward earnings per share (EPS) revisions have not been confined to the United States.  The chart below shows the 13-week average U.S. large cap EPS revisions in the context of those in emerging market (EM) nations, Europe, Japan, and the combined global corporate landscape via the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI).  The several lines make the chart a tad busy; however, the main point to draw is fairly conspicuous if you look at the far right:  EPS expectations have been falling sharply over the last year as corporations have looked ahead.

These observations about slowing economic growth and declining corporate earnings growth expectations both in the U.S. and abroad inform our guarded outlook in the wake of this year’s steep equity gains through February.  These developments also help to explain why the Federal Reserve has increasingly reinforced its data-dependent, wait-and-see approach to monetary policy in general and any potential future rake hikes in particular, as you can see from the collection of recent communications immediately below.


An additional interest rate increase later this year remains possible, but the hurdle rate to clear in order to warrant a move seems rather high.  The Fed, too, is aware of global growth deceleration, which it sees as occurring against a backdrop of stable inflation and wage growth, on the one hand, and the lack of risks of financial imbalance, on the other.

It is worth mentioning that headline and core inflation figures may increase slightly as the year progresses, however, we do not anticipate an inflation spike, and the Fed has said that it will allow inflation to run for a while modestly above its long-term target rate.  That is, unless inflation rises to a level that is persistently at or above the higher-end of its longer-term target, the Fed is unlikely to raise rates further.

One implication is that the core U.S. fixed income investment environment is likely to be stable for the time being. Another implication is that global liquidity may return to other assets that offer higher yields (such as EM bonds) or higher capital appreciation prospects (such as EM equities) because the Fed’s pause has stopped or slowed the appeal of risk-free assets with steadily increasing interest rates in the form of U.S. Treasuries.  If the Fed pivots in either policy or communication guidance, however, volatility may return to these assets.

Developments in U.S./China Trade Policy

On the trade front, the U.S. and China still have many details to work out before an agreement is reached, but both sides appear increasingly motivated. Officials have reported making steady progress toward an agreement.  In the final week of February, the deadline to reach an agreement before additional trade tariffs were scheduled to increase was extended indefinitely from its prior March 1 cutoff. Trump and Xi plan to meet in Florida near the end of March to discuss terms of an agreement and potentially to finalize an agreement.

We remain vigilantly optimistic.  China’s practices regarding intellectual property rights remain a major sticking point in negotiations, but recent rhetoric has been positive from both sides. The stakes in the U.S./China conflict are important. A return to more normalized political and trade relations could be positive for both economic growth and investment sentiment.  China, for instance, has recently lowered its guidance for its 2019 GDP growth, anticipating it to fall within a range of 6.0% to 6.5%.  China has been stimulating its economy to counter negative effects from the trade dispute with the U.S., but it has also been attempting to rein in government spending and reduce debt levels in recent years.  It has reversed course on those fronts to maintain stability.  An end to the trade dispute with the U.S. could help return both economic and political stability to China where the two are integrally related.

Prospects for Brexit

Various political moves by both U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May and opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn in February resulted in a sharply decreased chance that there would be a hard Brexit (i.e., without a deal in place) on March 29 and in a sharply increased probability that there would be a delayed and softer Brexit later this year or perhaps no Brexit at all.  The chart below, as of March 3 estimates, reflects the increased likelihood of a delay beyond March 29.

As we have maintained in recent months, the political situation in the U.K. regarding Brexit remains highly fluid.  In February, Corbyn announced, contrary to his long-held position, that he and his opposition Labour party would be open to a second referendum on the question of whether the U.K. should exit the E.U.  This move prompted Prime Minister May to concede, contrary to her own long-maintained stance, that she would be open to seeking a delayed exit beyond March if no satisfactory agreement were reached.

May had been tactically maneuvering so that the prospect of a hard Brexit might pressure lawmakers into adopting the terms that she had previously introduced to Parliament, which were rejected soundly on January 16 with 432 votes against and only 202 in favor.  Corbyn undermined that move by enticing EU-supporters within May’s Conservative party with the prospect of seeing a do-over referendum.  Lest she lose more votes or face more resignations from members with in her own party, May gave ground.

Where do things go from here with the clock winding down?  The graphic to the right outlines the key dates ahead. In our view, at present the most likely scenario is that the U.K. seeks a delayed exit, and May hopes for Parliament to pass the eventual terms sometime this summer.   

A delayed exit would likely be welcomed by markets because it avoids the worst-case scenario of a hard Brexit, which might easily tip the U.K. into recession.  Which road is eventually taken, however, remains unclear. We are content to remain patient with our basically neutral foreign developed market stock positions rather than try to guess the precise outcome.

Summary and Conclusion

Domestic economic growth seems durable if decelerating, inflation remains low, and employment remains high.  The U.S. economy is likely to continue to grow but at a slower pace than it has recently, as fiscal stimulus slows and the cost of borrowing remains stable but higher than a year ago.  We remain generally positive on the global economic outlook despite the unfinished trade agreement and ongoing uncertainties in Europe, including the growth slowdown there and the nature of Brexit. We continue to be of the opinion that in time China and the U.S. will strike a trade deal, but the precise path may still be filled with ups and downs.

As we move further into 2019, we do not think that the rate of gains realized in the first two months are likely to continue in subsequent months throughout the year. We continue to take a hopeful but realistic view about decelerating economic growth and corporate earnings growth globally.  We are encouraged about the possibility of soon clearing out one geopolitical risk that has been weighing on both economic and investor sentiment, the U.S.-China trade dispute, but we recognize that another, the nature and path of Brexit, remains unresolved and will likely be extended.  We are more comfortable now than last year with intermediate-term core bonds, given the still lingering risk factors globally and a more patient, steadier Fed.  However, we still believe that a balanced approach to portfolio asset allocations is warranted, rather than skewing allocations toward one type of investment or another.




The information and statistics contained in this report have been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed.  Any projections, market outlooks or estimates in this letter are forward-looking statements and are based upon certain assumptions. Other events which were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of these investments.  Any projections, outlooks or assumptions should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events which will occur. These projections, market outlooks or estimates are subject to change without notice.  Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  All indexes are unmanaged and you cannot invest directly in an index. Index returns do not include fees or expenses. Actual client portfolio returns may vary due to the timing of portfolio inception and/or client-imposed restrictions or guidelines. Actual client portfolio returns would be reduced by any applicable investment advisory fees and other expenses incurred in the management of an advisory account. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Sage Financial Group. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability above to his/her individual situation of any specific issue discussed, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing.  Sage Financial Group is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Sage Financial Group’s current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.


Sage Financial Group has a long track record of citations and accolades. Rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that s/he will experience a certain level of results if Sage is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Nor should it be construed as a current or past endorsement of Sage by any of its clients. Rankings published by magazines and others generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized advisor. For more specific information about any of these rankings, please visit Accolades page or contact us directly.


© 2019 Sage Financial Group.  Reproduction without permission is not permitted.